THE POTENTIAL OF CATEGORIZATION OF CRIMES IN THE SPHERE OF ECONOMIC ACTIVITY

Author:

KOZACHENKO IVAN,SERGEEV DANIL

Abstract

Introduction: categorization of crimes is a means of making criminal law rules and differentiating criminal liability. The article considers the current approaches to categorization of crimes stated by Chapter 22 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation; most constituent elements of crimes are non-grave crimes. Methods: the authors analyze the fact that the gravity of a crime does not always correlate with the level of public danger of a crime. In this connection, the authors suggest changing the boundaries between crimes, and also between crimes and administrative offenses. The article considers a possibility of introducing criminal infractions in the sphere of liability for crimes against economic activity. Analysis: the authors underline that the Russian criminal policy in the sphere of economic activity should be based on the inter-branch model of combating crimes. Such a model includes regulatory legislation, administrative and criminal liability; but the share of criminal-law regulation should be minimized, and criminal liability should be applied in case of really dangerous acts. The authors think that the measure of real danger in the economic sphere is the size of real damage caused, which should be calculated including a possible useful economic effect occurring as a result of this or that act. Results: the authors suggest excluding a possibility of building constituent elements of crimes bordering administrative offenses solely on the quantity elements of an act and classify such acts only in the category of administrative offenses or only in the category of crimes. The authors suggest viewing crimes of little gravity in the sphere of economic activity only as criminal infractions leading to no conviction.

Publisher

Ural State Law University

Subject

General Medicine

Reference9 articles.

1. Alvesalo A., Tombs S. Economic Crime Control in Finland, Sociology, 2004, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 165–174.

2. Bittle S. Beyond Corporate Fundamentalism: A Marxian Class Analysis of Corporate Crime Law Reform, Critical Sociology, 2013, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 133–151.

3. Croall H. Community safety and economic crime, Criminology and Criminal Justice, 2009, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 165–185.

4. Koistinen J. Sravnitel’no-pravovoi analiz granei prestupnogo i neprestupnogo po ugolovnomu pravu Finlyandii i Rossijskoi Federacii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Comparative Legal Analysis of the Criminal and Non-Criminal in the Criminal Law of Finland and the Russian Federation: cand. jur. sc. thesis], Yekaterinburg, 2009. 233 p.

5. Lopashenko N. A. Ugolovnaya politika po printsipu «chego izvolite?», ili Ugolovnyi zakon kak sredstvo resheniya vsekh problem [Criminal Policy on the Principle of «what would you like?», or A Criminal Law as a Means of Solving all Problems], Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 11. Pravo, 2015a, no. 1, pp. 44–55.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3