Affiliation:
1. Research Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management of Moscow Healthcare Department
Abstract
Introduction. A sufficient level of physical activity (PA) is crucial for maintaining population health. There is a wide range of methods and approaches to PA assessment, such as questionnaires that are a convenient tool for assessment of PA levels. Another modern way to assess PA is individual wearable devices, including accelerometers. Data obtained from accelerometers and other tools can contribute to questionnaire results used in PA studies. Purpose. This review was carried out with the aim of considering modern trends, examples and common methods of physical activity assessment of city residents.
Materials and methods. Relevant information was collected using PubMed and E-Library databases. Google and Yandex search systems were used to obtain additional data.
Results. This paper describes global trends in modern PA studies, presents the examples of Russian and foreign papers on PA of city population, as well as summarizes the main features of PA assessment tools. Notably, PA can be assessed using subjective and objective methods. International and national questionnaires are widely applied as a subjective assessment tool. At the same time, technologies for objective assessment based on digital systems, wearable devices and other approaches to PA monitoring are being developed. Methods for assessing PA can be selected in several stages using decision-making algorithms.
Conclusions. Upon the obtained results we assume that modern study design and methods of assessment of FA level among city residents helps to identify factors influencing the formation and maintenance of healthy lifestyle in urban environment.
Publisher
Research Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management
Reference51 articles.
1. Benton JS, Anderson J, Pulis M, Cotterill S, Hunter RF, French DP. Method for Observing Physical Activity and Wellbeing (MOHAWk): validation of an observation tool to assess physical activity and other wellbeing behaviours in urban spaces. Cities Heal 2022;6:818–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2020.1775383.
2. US Department of Health and Human Services and others. 2018 Physical activity guidelines advisory committee scientific report. US Dep Heal Hum Serv n.d.
3. No authors listed. WHO Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour. Geneva: 2020.
4. Owen N, Healy GN, Matthews CE, Dunstan DW. Too much sitting: the population health science of sedentary behavior. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2010;38:105–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/JES.0b013e3181e373a2.
5. Dowd KP, Szeklicki R, Minetto MA, Murphy MH, Polito A, Ghigo E, et al. A systematic literature review of reviews on techniques for physical activity measurement in adults: a DEDIPAC study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2018;15:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0636-2.