Author:
Thapa Sumana,Acharya Indira,Singh Meeta,Baral Josie
Abstract
Introduction: Episiotomy incision is the most common surgical procedure around the globe and in many countries, it became a routine policy. Episiotomy in all women with vaginal delivery has no benefit. Rate of episiotomy varies widely around the globe, while in Nepal all nulliparous and primi-parous hospital deliveries are given routine episiotomy. So, this study aimed to compare the maternal morbidity during first vaginal birth in women with or without episiotomy.Methods: This is a hospital based randomized prospective comparative study conducted in the Obstetrics and Gynaecology department of a teaching hospital. The subjects were divided into episiotomy group and no episiotomy group. Under local anaesthesia mediolateral episiotomy was given in the second stage with crowning of the head in episiotomy group. Nature of morbidity seen were recorded in both the groups immediately after delivery, after 6 hours and after 1 week and compared.Results: In no episiotomy group intact perineum 26.3%, laceration 10.5%, spontaneous perineal tear (first and second degree) 63.1% was observed. Total perineal surgical repair was 81.55%. Intact perineum was high among no episiotomy group. Third degree tear, vulval haematoma, wound gaping, perineal oedema were seen in episiotomy group.Conclusion: Anterior perineal laceration rate was high in no episiotomy group than episiotomy group but overall few morbidities were in no episiotomy group than in episiotomy group. So, episiotomy should not be considered to prevent insignificant anterior perineal lacerations.
Publisher
Nepal Journals Online (JOL)
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献