Computed Tomography Angiography versus Magnetic Resonance Angiography of Brain in Evaluating Cerebrovascular Diseases: A Cross-sectional Study

Author:

Sarvesh R,Shriram T,Jayakumar Jayakrishnan

Abstract

Introduction: In India, Cerebrovascular Disease (CVD) remains to be one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity. In recent times, the imaging of cerebrovascular disorders has undergone various advancements with the advent of digital technologies. Two novel imaging modalities include Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) and Computed Tomographic Angiography (CTA). Aim: To assess and compare Computed Tomography Angiogram (CTA) brain vs non contrast MR angiogram brain in evaluation of CVD. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the Department of Radiology, Arupadai Veedu Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India, from November 2020 to July 2022. All suspected cases of cerebrovascular accidents who were above 18 years of age were screened for the study. Finally, a total of 60 patients were recruited for the study. Demographic parameters like age, gender and occupation were collected. Past history of chronic illness, vitals, serum urea and creatinine were also assessed. MRA findings including stenosis, occlusion, and irregularity of vessels and features of stroke were assessed and compared to the findings on CTA images. Data was compiled and analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 19.0. Results: A maximum of 26 (43.3%) participants were in the age group of 61-70 years of age and, 60% of the cases were males and 40% of the cases were females. Out of the 60 patients, 40 (80%) had characteristics of CVD based on CTA, and 47 (78.3%) of the individuals indicated of CVD based on MRA results. The differences between MRA and CTA for CVD alterations were significant (p-value<0.0001). MRA had a diagnostic efficacy of 95% and had a sensitivity and specificity of 95.8% and 91.7% respectively, with PPV of 97.9%, and NPV of 84.6% as compared to CTA. Conclusion: The results of the present study demonstrate that MRA is equally effective as CTA in diagnosing cases with CVD.

Publisher

JCDR Research and Publications

Subject

Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3