Comparative Analysis of Immunohistochemistry of Hormone Receptors in Breast Cancer by Conventional and Microwave Tissue Processing Methods

Author:

Ramakrishnan Janaky,Sideeque Asiq N,Khader Reslin A

Abstract

Introduction: Rapid histopathological processing of neoplastic biopsies is crucial for initiating early therapy in patients. Microwave processing shortens the time to diagnosis and is less labour intensive. Aim: To compare the quality of immunohistochemical staining of Estrogen Receptors (ER) and Progesterone Receptors (PR) on paired breast samples using microwave processing versus conventional processing. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Kerala, India, from February 2014 to September 2015. A total of 44 paired samples from breast carcinoma patients were taken. Baseline characteristics of the patients such as age and type of carcinoma were noted. Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stain was used. One slide of the pair was processed conventionally and the other using a microwave. The stained slides were observed by three pathologists. The validity of ER and PR receptor status was evaluated with sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV). Kappa statistics and Spearman’s correlation test was used to denote the agreement between them. Results: The mean age was 51.32±11.16 years. There was agreement (Cohen k=0.902) between the microwave processed and conventionally processed paired breast samples for ER. The sensitivity and specificity of microwave processing in ER evaluation was 87.5% and 100% while that of PR evaluation was 92.9% and 100% respectively. The PPV was 100% and NPV was 93.3% for ER evaluation by microwave processing. Conclusion: Microwave aided tissue processing had significant advantages over conventional methods for providing a rapid diagnosis, being less laborious and had effective staining, which makes it a better choice.

Publisher

JCDR Research and Publications

Subject

Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3