Affiliation:
1. Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology
2. Loughborough University
Abstract
Hybrid electric powertrains in automotive applications aim to improve emissions and fuel economy with respect to conventional internal combustion engine vehicles. Variety of design scenarios need to be addressed in designing a hybrid electric vehicle to achieve desired design objectives such as fuel consumption and exhaust gas emissions. The work in this paper presents an analysis of the design objectives for an automobile powertrain with respect to different design scenarios, i. e. target drive cycle and degree of hybridization. Toward these ends, four powertrain configuration models (i. e. internal combustion engine, series, parallel and complex hybrid powertrain configurations) of a small vehicle (motorized three wheeler) are developed using Model Advisor software and simulated with varied drive cycles and degrees of hybridization. Firstly, the impact of vehicle power control strategy and operational characteristics of the different powertrain configurations are investigated with respect to exhaust gas emissions and fuel consumption. Secondly, the drive cycles are scaled according to kinetic intensity and the relationship between fuel consumption and drive cycles is assessed. Thirdly, three fuel consumption models are developed so that fuel consumption values for a real-world drive cycle may be predicted in regard to each powertrain configuration. The results show that when compared with a conventional powertrain fuel consumption is lower in hybrid vehicles. This work led to the surprisingly result showing higher CO emission levels with hybrid vehicles. Furthermore, fuel consumption of all four powertrains showed a strong correlation with kinetic intensity values of selected drive cycles. It was found that with varied drive cycles the average fuel advantage for each was: series 23 %, parallel 21 %, and complex hybrids 33 %, compared to an IC engine powertrain. The study reveals that performance of hybrid configurations vary significantly with drive cycle and degree of hybridization. The paper also suggests future areas of study.
Publisher
Belarusian National Technical University
Reference21 articles.
1. Huang Y., Surawski N. C., Organ B., Zhou J. L., Tang O.H.H., Chan E.F.C. (2019) Fuel consumption and emissions performance under real driving: Comparison between hybrid and conventional vehicles. Science of The Total Environment, 659, 275–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.349
2. Silvaş E., Hofman T., Steinbuch M. (2012) Review of optimal design strategies for hybrid electric vehicles. IFAC Proceedings, 45 (30) 57–64. https://doi.org/10.3182/20121023-3-FR-4025.00054
3. Silvas E. (2015) Integrated Optimal Design for Hybrid Electric Vehicles. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. Available at: https://research.tue.nl/en/publications/integrated-optimal-design-for-hybrid-electric-vehicles
4. World Health Organization (2017). Powered two and three wheeler safety: A road safety manual for decisionmakers and practitioners. World Health Organization. Available at: https://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/publications/road_traffic/ptw_manual/en/
5. Christensen J., Bastien C. (2016) Introduction to General Optimization Principles and Methods. Nonlinear Optimization of Vehicle Safety Structures. Elsevier Inc., 107–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-417297-5.00003-1
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献