Abstract
Objective: The study investigates the association between family structures and general attitudes toward adult children’s responsibilities to care for older parents.
Background: Despite remarkable changes in family structures in recent decades (e.g., the increasing share of stepfamilies), only a few studies have explored the association between family structures and perceived filial obligations. This study seeks to fill this gap.
Method: Using data from the German Family Panel (pairfam) (N = 8,709) collected from younger and middle-aged Germans, the study examined general attitudes toward adult children’s responsibilities to support parents in need. Linear regression models were used to investigate the association between family structure (i.e., respondents without parents and with biological and/or stepparents) and perceived filial obligation.
Results: Respondents with stepparents were less likely to support the idea of filial obligations compared to those without stepparents. In contrast, respondents without living biological parents were more inclined to agree with filial obligations than individuals with living biological parents. Moreover, filial obligations found stronger agreement among males than females and among the younger age cohort compared to older cohorts, regardless of family structure.
Conclusion: The findings highlight how the complexity of the family structures in contemporary society shapes perceived filial obligations.
Publisher
Universitatsbibliothek Bamberg
Reference26 articles.
1. Attias-Donfut, C., Ogg, J., & Wolff, F. C. (2005). European patterns of intergenerational financial and time transfers. European journal of ageing, 2(3), 161–173.
2. Bengtson, V. L. (2001). Beyond the nuclear family: the increasing importance of multigenerational bonds. Journal of marriage and family, 63(1), 1-16.
3. Bengtson, Vern L. & Roberts, Robert E. L. (1991) Intergenerational solidarity in aging families: an example of formal theory construction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53(4), 856–870.
4. Brüderl, J., Garrett, M., Hajek, K., Herzig, M., Lenke, R., Lorenz, R., Schütze, P., Schumann, N., & Timmermann, K. (2022): pairfam Data Manual, Release 13.0. LMU Munich: Technical report. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5678 Data File Version 13.0.0.
5. Cherlin, A. (1978). Remarriage as an incomplete institution. American journal of Sociology, 84(3), 634–650.