SARS-CoV-2 Diagnostic Tests: Algorithm and Field Evaluation From the Near Patient Testing to the Automated Diagnostic Platform

Author:

Yin Nicolas,Debuysschere Cyril,Decroly Marc,Bouazza Fatima-Zohra,Collot Vincent,Martin Charlotte,Ponthieux Fanny,Dahma Hafid,Gilbert Marius,Wautier Magali,Duterme Cecile,De Vos Nathalie,Delforge Marie-Luce,Malinverni Stefano,Cotton Frédéric,Bartiaux Magali,Hallin Marie

Abstract

Introduction: Since the first wave of COVID-19 in Europe, new diagnostic tools using antigen detection and rapid molecular techniques have been developed. Our objective was to elaborate a diagnostic algorithm combining antigen rapid diagnostic tests, automated antigen dosing and rapid molecular tests and to assess its performance under routine conditions.Methods: An analytical performance evaluation of four antigen rapid tests, one automated antigen dosing and one molecular point-of-care test was performed on samples sent to our laboratory for a SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription PCR. We then established a diagnostic algorithm by approaching median viral loads in target populations and evaluated the limit of detection of each test using the PCR cycle threshold values. A field performance evaluation including a clinical validation and a user-friendliness assessment was then conducted on the antigen rapid tests in point-of-care settings (general practitioners and emergency rooms) for outpatients who were symptomatic for <7 days. Automated antigen dosing was trialed for the screening of asymptomatic inpatients.Results: Our diagnostic algorithm proposed to test recently symptomatic patients using rapid antigen tests, asymptomatic patients using automated tests, and patients requiring immediate admission using molecular point-of-care tests. Accordingly, the conventional reverse transcription PCR was kept as a second line tool. In this setting, antigen rapid tests yielded an overall sensitivity of 83.3% (not significantly different between the four assays) while the use of automated antigen dosing would have spared 93.5% of asymptomatic inpatient screening PCRs.Conclusion: Using tests not considered the “gold standard” for COVID-19 diagnosis on well-defined target populations allowed for the optimization of their intrinsic performances, widening the scale of our testing arsenal while sparing molecular resources for more seriously ill patients.

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Subject

General Medicine

Reference33 articles.

1. Laboratory Testing of 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in Suspected Human Cases: Interim Guidance2020

2. Considerations for diagnostic COVID-19 tests;Vandenberg;Nat. Rev. Microbiol.,2020

3. Comparison of seven commercial SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care antigen tests;Corman;medRxiv.,2020

4. Antigen-Detection in the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Using Rapid Immunoassays2020

5. Rapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection;Dinnes;Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3