Diagnostic accuracy of perfusion-weighted phase-resolved functional lung magnetic resonance imaging in patients with chronic pulmonary embolism

Author:

Duan Jianghui,Xie Sheng,Sun Hongliang,An Jing,Li Huan,Li Ling,Grimm Robert,Voskrebenzev Andreas,Vogel-Claussen Jens

Abstract

PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of perfusion-weighted phase-resolved functional lung (PW-PREFUL) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with chronic pulmonary embolism (CPE).Materials and methodsThis study included 86 patients with suspected chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), who underwent PREFUL MRI and ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT). PREFUL MRI was performed at 1.5 T using a balanced steady-state free precession sequence during free breathing. Color-coded PW images and quantitative parameters were obtained by postprocessing. Meanwhile, V/Q SPECT/CT imaging was performed as a reference standard. Hypoperfused areas in the lungs were scored for each lobe and segment using V/Q SPECT/CT images and PW-PREFUL MR images, respectively. Normalized perfusion (QN) and perfusion defect percentage (QDP) were calculated for all slices. For intra- and interobserver variability, the MRI images were analyzed 2 months after the first analysis by the same radiologist and another radiologist (11 years of lung MRI experience) blinded to the results of the first reader.ResultsOf the 86 enrolled patients, 77 met the inclusion criteria (36 diagnosed with CPE using V/Q SPECT/CT and 41 diagnosed with non-CPE etiology). For the PW-PREFUL MRI, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values for the diagnosis of CPE were 97, 95, 96, 95, and 98% at the patient level; 91, 94, 93, 91, and 94% at the lobe level, and 85, 94, 92, 88, and 94% at the segment level, respectively. The detection of segmental and subsegmental hypoperfusion using PW-PREFUL MRI revealed a moderate agreement with V/Q SPECT/CT (κ = 0.65; 95% confidence interval: 0.61–0.68). The quantitative results indicated that the QN was lower in the CPE group than in the non-CPE group [median score (interquartile range, IQR) 6.3 (2.8–9.2) vs. 13.0 (8.8–16.7), p < 0.001], and the QDP was higher [median score (IQR) 33.8 (15.7–51.7) vs. 2.2 (1.4–2.9), p < 0.001].ConclusionPREFUL MRI could be an alternative test to detect CPE without requiring breath-hold, contrast agents, or ionizing radiation.

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3