Author:
Curley Cali,Aloise-Young Patricia,Harrison Nicky,Xu Corey Kewei,Duggan Gerald P.,Zimmerle Daniel
Abstract
Numerous recent calls have been made for policy design research to embed itself throughout the policy process and explore avenues for matching tools and targets. These calls have argued that policy design research, while emphasizing the content and the choice of design, has been under-leveraged, particularly in exploring rationales for effectiveness. In this paper, we conduct a comparative case study to explore variation in participation rates for two similarly categorized solar policies across two mid-sized cities. In this regard, three contextual factors are examined, including the population characteristics, the existing configuration of policies, and the physical environment, which all contribute to shaping policy effectiveness. We argue that policy design is situated within an explicit context and that without capturing the context, the effectiveness of policies may not translate if diffused.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Reference131 articles.
1. How Schools Do Policy
2. Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers;Baxter;Qual. Rep.,2008
3. Solar-permissive model zoning ordinances: Rationale, considerations, and examples;Becker;Appl. Energy,2019
4. Jezebels, Matriarchs, and Welfare Queens: The Moynihan Report of 1965 and the Social Construction of African-American Women in Welfare Policy;Bensonsmith,2005
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献