Comparison of Two Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Canine Disc Associated-Cervical Spondylomyelopathy

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare prosthetic disc and vertebral distraction stabilization in dogs with disc-associated cervical spondylomyelopathy (DA-CSM).Study DesignA retrospective clinical study.Animals25 dogs.MethodsDogs presenting with clinical signs and MRI findings compatible with DA-CSM underwent surgery. Implantation of the Adamo's prosthetic disc (PD) or vertebral distraction-stabilization (DS) with intervertebral cage, ventral locking plates, and dorsal transarticular screws was performed. All dogs were followed-up and evaluated clinically for a minimum of 1 year and radiographically for at least 3 months. In particular, we focused on the evaluation of subsidence (the degree of vertebral collapse).ResultsTwenty-five dogs were enrolled: 12 with PD implantation and 13 with DS implantation. Of these, 24 dogs were followed-up at 1 year. Overall, 12 dogs improved (4 PD and 8 DS), eight were stable (4 PD and 4 DS), and four deteriorated (3 PD and 1 DS). Deterioration was more common in PD cases, especially soon after surgery. In a few PD cases, a second surgery was necessary. The most common complication in dogs with DS was discospondylitis. Subsidence was detected in 11 PD and 7 DS dogs. Subsidence was more severe and occurred sooner after surgery in PD cases compared to DS cases. DS cases were more prone to clinical improvement and less prone to subsidence than PD cases in this study. However, the statistical evidence was weak owing to the small sample size.ConclusionThe preliminary results suggest that prosthetic disc implantation is more prone to clinical and radiographic failures than distraction stabilization.Clinical RelevanceThe DS technique is a valuable surgical option for treating dogs with DA-CSM, with favorable short- and long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes.