Author:
Osemeke Onyekachukwu H.,Cezar Guilherme A.,Paiva Rodrigo C.,Moraes Daniel C. A.,Machado Isadora F.,Magalhaes Edison S.,Poeta Silva Ana Paula S.,Mil-Homens Mafalda,Peng Li,Jayaraman Swaminathan,Trevisan Giovani,Silva Gustavo S.,Gauger Phillip C.,Linhares Daniel C. L.
Abstract
IntroductionThe porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) continues to challenge swine production in the US and most parts of the world. Effective PRRSV surveillance in swine herds can be challenging, especially because the virus can persist and sustain a very low prevalence. Although weaning-age pigs are a strategic subpopulation in the surveillance of PRRSV in breeding herds, very few sample types have been validated and characterized for surveillance of this subpopulation. The objectives of this study, therefore, were to compare PRRSV RNA detection rates in serum, oral swabs (OS), nasal swabs (NS), ear-vein blood swabs (ES), and family oral fluids (FOF) obtained from weaning-age pigs and to assess the effect of litter-level pooling on the reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) detection of PRRSV RNA.MethodsThree eligible PRRSV-positive herds in the Midwestern USA were selected for this study. 666 pigs across 55 litters were sampled for serum, NS, ES, OS, and FOF. RT-qPCR tests were done on these samples individually and on the litter-level pools of the swabs. Litter-level pools of each swab sample type were made by combining equal volumes of each swab taken from the pigs within a litter.ResultsNinety-six piglets distributed across 22 litters were positive by PRRSV RT-qPCR on serum, 80 piglets distributed across 15 litters were positive on ES, 80 piglets distributed across 17 litters were positive on OS, and 72 piglets distributed across 14 litters were positive on NS. Cohen's kappa analyses showed near-perfect agreement between all paired ES, OS, NS, and serum comparisons (). The serum RT-qPCR cycle threshold values (Ct) strongly predicted PRRSV detection in swab samples. There was a ≥ 95% probability of PRRSV detection in ES-, OS-, and NS pools when the proportion of positive swab samples was ≥ 23%, ≥ 27%, and ≥ 26%, respectively.DiscussionES, NS, and OS can be used as surveillance samples for detecting PRRSV RNA by RT-qPCR in weaning-age pigs. The minimum number of piglets to be sampled by serum, ES, OS, and NS to be 95% confident of detecting ≥ 1 infected piglet when PRRSV prevalence is ≥ 10% is 30, 36, 36, and 40, respectively.
Reference76 articles.
1. Costa M, Niemi J, Leonard FC, et al. Financial analysis of herd status and vaccination practices for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, swine influenza virus, and mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in farrow-to-finish pig farms using a bio-economic simulation model;Calderón Díaz;Front Vet Sci,2020
2. Characterization of changes in productivity parameters as breeding herds transitioned through the 2021 PRRSV breeding herd classification system;Osemeke;J Swine Health Production.,2022
3. Assessing production parameters and economic impact of swine influenza, PRRS and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae on finishing pigs in a large production system;Dykhuis Haden,2012
4. Assessment of the economic impact of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus on United States pork producers;Holtkamp;J Swine Health Prod,2013
5. Surveillance of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in the United States using risk mapping and species distribution modeling;Alkhamis;Prev Vet Med.,2018