Network Meta-Analysis of Open Reduction Internal Fixation, Intramedullary Nail Fixation, and Distal Femoral Replacement for Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures

Author:

Lu Yao,Xu Yibo,Ren Cheng,Wang Qian,Sun Liang,Zhang Chengcheng,Huang Qiang,Xue Hanzhong,Li Zhong,Zhang Kun,Zhao Yang,Ma Teng

Abstract

Background: Although open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with periarticular locking plates, retrograde intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation, and distal femoral replacement (DFR) have been widely used for the treatment of periprosthetic distal femur fractures (PPDFF), it remains unclear which one may be an optimal surgical strategy.Objective: This network meta-analysis aimed to determine the optimal surgical strategy for PPDFF from ORIF, IMN, and DFR by evaluating major complication rates and revision rates.Patients and Methods: We identified eligible studies by performing an updated literature search in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and checking published meta-analyses. The methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) was used to assess the methodological quality of eligible studies. Major complications and revision rates were defined as outcomes of interest. All statistical analyses were performed by ADDIS 1.4 software.Results: We included 17 eligible studies in the final analysis. Statistical analyses did not reveal significant differences when ORIF was compared with IMN and ORIF compared with DFR, and IMN compared with DFR in terms of two clinical outcomes. However, DFR achieved a beneficial trend in major complications [odds ratio (OR) = 1.34; 95% CrI = 0.48–3.80] and revision (OR = 1.64; 95% CrI = 0.68–4.38) rates compared with IMN. Ranking probabilities indicate that DFR has the highest probability of being the optimal option, followed by ORIF and IMN.Conclusion: There was no difference in major complications or reoperations between the three treatments. However, ORIF with periarticular locking plates may be a preferred alternative option because DFR is limited by the high cost. Moreover, our study highlights the need for future prospective trials evaluating the outcomes of these three surgical strategies.

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Subject

Materials Science (miscellaneous)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3