Intraoperative hemodynamic optimization using the hypotension prediction index vs. goal-directed hemodynamic therapy during elective major abdominal surgery: the Predict-H multicenter randomized controlled trial

Author:

Lorente Juan V.,Ripollés-Melchor Javier,Jiménez Ignacio,Becerra Alejandra I.,Mojarro Irene,Fernández-Valdes-Bango Paula,Fuentes Maria A.,Moreno Ana,Agudelo Maria E.,Villar-Pellit de la Vega Angel,Ruiz-Escobar Alicia,Cortés Azahara,Venturoli Rocio,Quintero Ana,Acedo Guadalupe M.,Abad-Motos Ane,Gómez Peña,Abad-Gurumeta Alfredo,Monge-García Manuel I.

Abstract

BackgroundIntraoperative hypotension (IOH) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality after major abdominal surgery but remains significant even when using goal-directed hemodynamic therapy (GDHT) protocols. The Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI) is a machine learning-derived parameter that predicts arterial hypotension. We tested the hypothesis that an HPI-based protocol reduces the duration and severity of hypotension compared with a GDHT protocol during major abdominal surgery.MethodsThis is a parallel-arm double-blinded multicenter randomized trial involving adult patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery at five centers. Patients were optimized according to a previously recommended GDHT protocol (GDHT group) or the HPI value (HPI group). Hemodynamic optimization in both groups started 15 min after the surgical incision. The primary outcome was the intraoperative time-weighted average of mean arterial pressure under 65 mmHg (TWA-MAP < 65 mmHg). Other metrics for IOH and secondary outcomes, including TWA below individual baseline values of intraoperative tissue oxygenation (StO2), postoperative AKIRisk, postoperative complications, length of stay, and 30-day mortality, were explored.ResultsEighty patients were randomized (40 patients in each group). TWA-MAP < 65 mmHg was 0.06 (25th–75th interquartile range: 0–0.27) mmHg in the GDTH group vs. 0 (0–0.04) mmHg in the HPI group (p = 0.015). Total time with MAP < 65 mmHg per patient was 4.6 (0–21) min in the GDHT group and 0 (0–3) min in the HPI group (p = 0.008). The TWA below the baseline StO2 was 0.40% (0.12%–2.41%) in the GDHT group and 0.95% (0.15%–3.20%) in the HPI group (p = 0.353). The AKIRisk values obtained in the GDHT group were 0.30 (0.14–0.53) and 0.34 (0.15–0.67) in the GDHT and HPI groups (p = 0.731), respectively. Both groups had similar postoperative complications, length of stay, and 30-day mortality.ConclusionsAn HPI-based protocol reduced intraoperative hypotension compared with a standard GDHT protocol, with no differences in tissue oxygenation and postoperative AKIRisk.

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3