Author:
Sucunza Federico,Danilewicz Daniel,Andriolo Artur,de Castro Franciele R.,Cremer Marta,Denuncio Pablo,Ferreira Emanuel,Flores Paulo A. C.,Ott Paulo H.,Perez Martin S.,Pretto Dan,Sartori Camila M.,Secchi Eduardo R.,Zerbini Alexandre N.
Abstract
Line transect aerial surveys are widely used for estimating abundance of biological populations, including threatened species. However, estimates obtained with data collected from aircraft are often underestimated because of visibility bias and bias in estimating group sizes from a fast-moving platform. An assessment of multiple sources of bias in aerial surveys were carried out in Brazilian coastal waters by experiments on multiple survey platforms (i.e., boat, airplane and helicopter). These studies focused on evaluating visibility bias (perception and availability bias) and potential differences in the estimation of group sizes from different types of platforms used in franciscana (Pontoporia blainvillei) abundance surveys. The ultimate goal was to develop correction factors to improve accuracy of estimates of density and population size for this threatened dolphin. Estimates of density and group sizes computed from boats were assumed to be unbiased and were compared to estimates of these quantities obtained from an airplane in the same area and period. In addition, helicopter surveys were conducted in two areas where water turbidity differed (clear vs. murky waters) to determine surfacing-diving intervals of franciscana groups and to estimate availability for aerial platforms. Abundance computed from the aerial survey data underestimated the true abundance by about 4-5 times, with ~70% of the total bias resulting from visibility bias (~80% from availability bias and ~20% from perception bias) and ~30% from bias in estimates of group size. The use of multiple survey platforms in contrasting habitats provided the opportunity to compute correction factors that can be used to refine range wide abundance estimates of the threatened franciscana given certain assumptions are met. Visibility bias and group size bias were substantial and clearly indicate the importance for accounting for such correction factors to produce unequivocal population assessment based on aerial survey data.
Subject
Ocean Engineering,Water Science and Technology,Aquatic Science,Global and Planetary Change,Oceanography
Reference60 articles.
1. Reassessment of the franciscana pontoporia blainvillei (Gervais & d’Orbigny 1844) distribution and niche characteristics in Brazil;Amaral;J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.,2018
2. Humpback whales within the Brazilian breeding ground: Distribution and population size estimate;Andriolo;Endangered Species Res.,2010
3. Inferring trackline detection probabilities, g(0), for cetaceans from apparent densities in different survey conditions;Barlow;Mar. Mammal Sci.,2015
4. Harbor porpoise, phocoena phocoena, abundance estimation for California, Oregon, and Washington: II. aerial surveys;Barlow;Fishery Bull.,1988
5. Horvitz-Thompson estimators for double-platform line transect surveys;Borchers;Biometrics,1998
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献