Feasibility of the application of frequency modulated continuous wave radar trigger technique in abdominal magnetic resonance imaging

Author:

Song Qingling,He Yongquan,Chen Lihua,Xia Xinyuan,Wang Nan,Song Qingwei,Liu Ailian

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate and compare the image quality of T2-weighted abdominal scans using a respiratory belt trigger (RBT) and frequency-modulated continuous wave (FMCW)-trigger (FT) techniques and to explore the feasibility of FT in abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Methods: The study prospectively included 28 subjects, each undergoing abdominal scans with both RBT and FT. The analysis focused on 64 inconsistent trigger segments from the respiratory curves triggered by RBT and FMCW. Parameters such as inconsistent trigger type (ITT), number of inconsistent trigger points (ITPs), ratio of ITP (ITR), and single-segment ITR (SITR) were derived from these curves. Image quality was evaluated by two observers using subjective scoring, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). The assessments classified image quality as either “good” or “poor.” Consistency in image quality assessment between observers was determined using the kappa test and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The chi-square test, Student’s t-test, and the Mann–Whitney U test were employed to compare the categorical and continuous variables between the RBT and FT groups.Results: The observers showed a high level of agreement in image quality assessment. There were no significant differences in ITR, SITR, acquisition time, SNR, and CNR between the RBT and FT groups (all p > 0.05). Both subjective and objective evaluations indicated no notable difference in image quality between the two groups (p > 0.05).Conclusion: The FMCW trigger technique is a viable alternative to the traditional respiratory belt trigger in scenarios of relatively stable breathing. It offers potential benefits, such as reducing operational demands on technicians and improving MRI workflow efficiency.

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3