Author:
Lamprecht Nina,Erlanger Tobias E.,Utzinger Jürg,Winkler Mirko S.
Abstract
ObjectivesIn 2008, an analysis investigating health impact assessment (HIA) practice found that only 6% of HIA-related peer-reviewed publications had a focus on low- and medium-developed countries, whereas 94% were conducted in countries with a high or very high development state. We aimed to update and deepen these observations.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review, searching PubMed and Web of Science for HIA-related papers published in the scientific literature from June 2007 to January 2023. Only applied HIA and papers with HIA as a subject were included.ResultsThe search yielded 3,036 publications and the final selection consisted of 1,019 publications. The annual number of total publications increased considerably over the past 15 years. Whereas research-driven HIA (n = 460) showed a steep increase, step-by-step HIA (n = 71) did not show a clear trend.ConclusionThe gap between the number of HIA-related peer-reviewed publications focusing on low/medium and high/very high developed countries has diminished from 6/94 to 11/89. There is a growing tendency to apply the terminology HIA for health impact modelling studies and quantitative health risk assessments.
Funder
Direktion für Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit
Reference27 articles.
1. Health Impact Assessment, International Best Practice Principles;Winkler;Int Assoc Impact Assess,2021
2. Systematic Literature Review of Health Impact Assessments in Low and Middle-Income Countries;Thondoo;Int J Environ Res Public Health,2019
3. Current Global Health Impact Assessment Practice;Winkler;Int J Environ Res Public Health,2020
4. Health Impact Assessment Legislation in Developing Countries: A Path to Sustainable Development?;Thondoo;Rev Eur Comp Int Environ L,2021
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献