Author:
Luo Shiqi,Zheng Zhen,Bird Stephen Richard,Plebanski Magdalena,Figueiredo Bernardo,Jessup Rebecca,Stelmach Wanda,Robinson Jennifer A.,Xenos Sophia,Olasoji Micheal,Wan Dawn Wong Lit,Sheahan Jacob,Itsiopoulos Catherine
Abstract
Objective: To identify gaps among Australian Long COVID support services and guidelines alongside recommendations for future health programs.Methods: Electronic databases and seven government health websites were searched for Long COVID-specific programs or clinics available in Australia as well as international and Australian management guidelines.Results: Five Long COVID specific guidelines and sixteen Australian services were reviewed. The majority of Australian services provided multidisciplinary rehabilitation programs with service models generally consistent with international and national guidelines. Most services included physiotherapists and psychologists. While early investigation at week 4 after contraction of COVID-19 is recommended by the Australian, UK and US guidelines, this was not consistently implemented.Conclusion: Besides Long COVID clinics, future solutions should focus on early identification that can be delivered by General Practitioners and all credentialed allied health professions. Study findings highlight an urgent need for innovative care models that address individual patient needs at an affordable cost. We propose a model that focuses on patient-led self-care with further enhancement via multi-disciplinary care tools.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Community and Home Care
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献