Author:
Elliott David,Soifer Eldon
Abstract
Privacy remains one of the most recurrent concerns that people have about AI technologies. The meaning of the concept of “privacy” has proven to be fairly elusive. Accordingly, the concerns people have about privacy are often vague and ill-formed, which makes it correspondingly difficult to address these concerns, and to explain the ways in which AI technologies do or do not pose threats to people's interests. In this article, we draw attention to some important distinctions that are frequently overlooked, and spell out their implications for concerns about the threats that AI-related technology poses for privacy. We argue that, when people express concerns about privacy in relation to AI technologies, they are usually referring to security interests rather than interests in privacy per se. Nevertheless, we argue that focusing primarily on security interests misses the importance that interests in privacy per se have through their contribution to autonomy and the development of our identities. Improving insight about these issues can make it easier for the developers of AI technologies to provide explanations for users about what interests are and are not at stake through the use of AI systems.
Reference27 articles.
1. “Ambient intelligence,”;Aarts,2009
2. Freedom and privacy in ambient intelligence;Brey;Ethics Inform. Technol.,2005
3. What privacy is for19041933
CohenJ. E
Harvard Law Rev.1262013
4. Privacy and perfect voyeurism;Doyle;Ethics Inform. Technol.,2009
5. Gossip in evolutionary perspective;Dunbar;Rev. Gen. Psychol.,2004
Cited by
32 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献