Author:
Chaib Romy Lynn,Macombe Catherine,Thomopoulos Rallou
Abstract
Prospective studies require discussing and collaborating with the stakeholders to create scenarios of the possible evolution of the studied value-chain. However, stakeholders do not always use the same words when referring to one idea. Constructing an ontology and homogenizing vocabularies is thus crucial to identify key variables, which serve in the construction of the needed scenarios. Nevertheless, it is a very complex and time-consuming task. In this paper we present the method we used to manually build ontologies adapted to the needs of two complementary system-analysis models (namely the “Godet” and the “MyChoice” models), starting from interviews of the agri-food system's stakeholders. The objective of the paper is to explore whether and how prospective studies may have to gain from complementing the methodologies used (here Godet) with formal approaches from other disciplines, such as knowledge engineering (here MyChoice), which is usually not the case currently.
Reference23 articles.
1. Rapport d'information N° 3731 sur les sels nitrités dans l'industrie agroalimentaire2021
2. Trade relationships in the european pork value chain: a network analysis;Barberis;Econ. Agro.,2020
3. Collaborative modelling or participatory modelling? A framework for water resources management;Basco-Carrera;Environ. Model. Software,2017
4. “Adaptation of a Participatory System-Modeling Method to the Constraints of Remote Working,”;Chaib;in Conference on Complex Systems-France (FRCCS 2021),2021