Author:
Alam Mir Muhammad Mansoor,Hassan Amjed,Mahmoud Mohamed,Sibaweihi Najmudeen,Patil Shirish
Abstract
Injection of CO2 to enhance oil recovery is widely used due to its multiple advantages such as mobilizing the oil and sequestration of carbon dioxide. Injection of CO2 can enhance oil recovery by reducing oil viscosity and improving overall fluid mobility. However, several problems are associated with CO2 injection such as viscous fingering, gravity override, and CO2 channeling that results in early gas breakthrough, low sweep efficiency, and low ultimate oil recovery. In this study, dual benefits of CO2 injection are presented: enhancing oil recovery and sequestering carbon dioxide. In this work, different scenarios of field scale simulation were conducted to evaluate oil recovery during CO2 injection, and the CMG (Computer Modeling Group) software package was used. Three main scenarios were examined which are CO2 injection into the reservoir, CO2 injection into the aquifer, and CO2 injection into the aquifer followed by waterflooding. Also, three well configurations were utilized—all injectors and producers are drilled vertically, all wells are drilled horizontally, and vertical injectors and horizontal producers are used. Therefore, the oil recovery profiles were examined for nine scenarios over a 20-year period. In all simulated models, CO2 injection was started at the residual oil saturation (Sor) conditions, to represent the cases of depleted oil reservoirs. The results indicated that the highest oil recovery of 73% of the original oil-in-place (OOIP) can be achieved by injecting CO2 into the reservoir, utilizing vertical injectors and producers. While injecting CO2 into aquifers can significantly enhance oil recovery by around 68–70% of the OOIP, using horizontal wells can provide more oil recovery (67.7%) than that using vertical wells (54.8%), in the same conditions. Moreover, around 7,928 tons of carbon dioxide can be sequestered in underground formations, on average. Finally, CO2 injection outperformed the conventional waterflooding, where 68 and 12% of the OOIP were obtained, respectively. Overall, injection of CO2 into the depleted reservoir can provide dual benefits of CO2 sequestration and improved oil recovery. CO2 can be injected into the water zone resulting in a slow release of CO2 which will reduce the fluid viscosity, enhance oil recovery, and reduce the greenhouse effect.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Fuel Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference50 articles.
1. March. In-Situ Generation of CO2 to Eliminate the Problem of Gravity Override in EOR of Carbonate Reservoirs;Abdelgawad,2015
2. March. A Slow Release CO2 for Enhanced Oil Recovery in Carbonate Reservoirs;Alam,2015
3. May. Optimization of CO2-EOR Process in Partially Depleted Oil Reservoirs;Ampomah,2016
4. September. Dependence on Temperature, Pressure, and Salinity of the IFT and Relative Permeability Displacement Characteristics of CO2 Injected in Deep saline Aquifers;Bennion,2006
5. Well Radius of Influence and Radius of Investigation: What Exactly Are They and How to Estimate Them?;Bresciani;J. Hydrol.,2020