Abstract
The Welsh vote for “leave” in the Brexit referendum surprised some academics and analysts due to its strong preference for Labor and its close financial ties to the EU. It also brought up a debate about apparent differences in Welsh and English attitudes towards race, ethnicity, and migration, with the former often claiming to have a more positive stance regarding the presence of ethnic minorities and foreign nationalities. This paper proposes to analyze discourse posted on Twitter during June 2016, specifically targeting Wales and England with the aim to offer insight into the perceptions and beliefs of Welsh and English individuals on the platform and if attitudes on race, ethnicity, and migration played a significant role. Counterfactuals are checked with posts from the first few weeks of the refugee crisis in Afghanistan in 2021, the war on Ukraine, and the announcement of the Rwanda policy. The current discussion of Welsh national identity includes its claims as a “nation of sanctuary” and that understands oppression and marginalization. Thus, Welsh perspectives on Brexit become an interesting viewpoint to comprehending ethnic minorities and foreigners as it creates a possible conflict between the institutional discourse, cultural views, and perceived economic needs. In this context, this paper takes the view that Twitter is an area where individuals post their thoughts uninhibited, and where we can conduct an aggregate analysis of that public sentiment.
Reference40 articles.
1. Who voted for Brexit? Individual and regional data combined;Alabrese;Eur. J. Polit. Econ.,2019
2. Representantes, representados e mídias sociais: mapeando o mecanismo de agendamento informacional;Almeida,2017
3. Embates e silêncios: Lideranças Partidárias do Legislativo no Twitter;Almeida;Aurora. Revista de Arte, Mídia e Política,2021
4. The human geography of twitter: quantifying regional identity and inter-region communication in England and Wales;Arthur;PLoS One,2019
5. Who voted for Brexit? A Comprehensive District-level analysis;Becker,2017