Abstract
This Perspective Essay draws from an experience of deception in virtual fieldwork and considers implications for those designing methodologies for virtual ethnographies. As qualitative field work increasingly takes place within virtual spaces and through virtual means, researchers are faced with critical dilemmas in the processes of data gathering and verification. One of these dilemmas concerns ensuring data validity and facticity if encountered with research subjects who are deceptive about their identity, experiences, or relationship to the field of research. This Perspective Essay offers specific guidelines concerning articulating the nature and possibilities of deception in virtual spaces, identifying deceptive data, and what to do with deceptive data in order to maintain data validity and transparency.
Reference8 articles.
1. My time with the Anons: making my digital self with conspiracy theorists
ForbergPeter
Ethnographic Marginalia.2021
2. The moral discourse of free speech: a virtual ethnographic study;Goldman-Hasbun;J. Contemp. Ethnogr.,2022
3. GorskiKarlyn
2021
4. What good is qualitative literacy without data transparency?;Jerolmack;Sociol. Methods Res.,2022
5. Ethnography, data transparency, and the information age;Murphy;Annu. Rev. Sociol.,2021
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献