Abstract
The global migration of COVID-19 not only disrupted transborder movement. In many (if not most) states, statis, and closure became the default norm at and within borders. This, in turn, generated exceptions organized around an idea of “essential” entry. The category of “essential” was produced, revised, and represented through the interaction of pandemic-driven exigencies and nationally specific configurations of the legal, political, and economic forces in play. To understand how the admission into Canada of certain people was accepted as legally, economically and/or politically essential, one must take account of Canada's character as a settler society, its economic integration with the United States, and its growing dependence on migrant workers and international students to subsidize food production and higher education for nationals.
Reference36 articles.
1. “From Slavery to Expulsion: Racism, Canadian Immigration Law and the Unfulfilled Promise of Modern Constitutionalism,”;Aiken,2007
2. BureauB.
Turned away at border, pregnant couple stranded in New York's coronavirus zone. 7 May 2020. CBC News Online
3. BureauB.
Internal documents show CBSA scenarios to decide who gets across the border — and who doesn't. 2 June 2020. CBC News Online
4. 31977522Canada, 2020 FC 7702020
5. Dutch government backs down over ‘sweetheart visas' for long-distance couplesNews
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献