Author:
Yang Keen,Chen Jing,Wu Huaiyu,Tian Hongtian,Ye Xiuqin,Xu Jinfeng,Luo Xunpeng,Dong Fajin
Abstract
Introduction: We compare the differences in the diagnostic results of S-thyroid, a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) software, based on two mutually perpendicular planes.Methods: Initially, 149 thyroid nodules confirmed by surgical pathology were enrolled in our study. CAD in our study was based on the ACR TI-RADS lexicon. t test, rank-sum test, and Chi-square test were used. The interclass correlation coefficient and Cohen’s kappa were used to explore the correlation between CAD features. Receiver operating characteristic was plotted for different combinations of CAD features.Results: The patient’s age, transverse diameter, longitudinal diameter, shape, margin, echogenicity, echogenic foci, composition, TI-RADS classification, and risk probability of nodules in the transverse and longitudinal planes were related to thyroid cancer (p < 0.05). The AUC (95%CI) of TI-RADS classification in the transverse plane of CAD is better than that of the longitudinal plane [0.90 (0.84–0.95) vs. 0.83 (0.77–0.90), p = 0.04]. The AUC (95%CI) of risk probability of nodules in the transverse planes shows no difference from that in the longitudinal plane statistically [0.90 (0.85–0.95) vs. 0.88 (0.82–0.94), p = 0.52]. The AUC (95% CI), specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy [TI-RADS classification (transverse plane) + TI-RADS classification (longitudinal plane) + risk (transverse plane) + risk (longitudinal plane)] are 0.93 (0.89–0.97), 86.15%, 90.48%, and 88.59%, respectively.Conclusion: The diagnosis of thyroid cancer in the CAD transverse plane was superior to that in the CAD longitudinal plane when using the TI-RADS classification, but there was no difference in the diagnosis between the two planes when using risk. However, the combination of CAD transverse and longitudinal planes had the best diagnostic ability.
Funder
Science, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality
Subject
Physiology (medical),Physiology