Comparison of multilayer and single-layer coronary plaque models on stress/strain calculations based on optical coherence tomography images

Author:

Huang Mengde,Maehara Akiko,Tang Dalin,Zhu Jian,Wang Liang,Lv Rui,Zhu Yanwen,Zhang Xiaoguo,Matsumura Mitsuaki,Chen Lijuan,Ma Genshan,Mintz Gary S.

Abstract

Mechanical stress and strain conditions are closely related to atherosclerotic plaque progression and rupture and have been under intensive investigations in recent years. It is well known that arteries have a three-layer structure: intima, media and adventitia. However, in vivo image-based multilayer plaque models are not available in the current literature due to lack of multilayer image segmentation data. A multilayer segmentation and repairing technique was introduced to segment coronary plaque optical coherence tomography (OCT) image to obtain its three-layer vessel structure. A total of 200 OCT slices from 20 patients (13 male; 7 female) were used to construct multilayer and single-layer 3D thin-slice models to calculate plaque stress and strain and compare model differences. Our results indicated that the average maximum plaque stress values of 20 patients from multilayer and single-layer models were 385.13 ± 110.09 kPa and 270.91 ± 95.86 kPa, respectively. The relative difference was 42.2%, with single-layer stress serving as the base value. The average mean plaque stress values from multilayer and single-layer models were 129.59 ± 32.77 kPa and 93.27 ± 18.20 kPa, respectively, with a relative difference of 38.9%. The maximum and mean plaque strain values obtained from the multilayer models were 11.6% and 19.0% higher than those from the single-layer models. Similarly, the maximum and mean cap strains showed increases of 9.6% and 12.9% over those from the single-layer models. These findings suggest that use of multilayer models could improve plaque stress and strain calculation accuracy and may have large impact on plaque progression and vulnerability investigation and potential clinical applications. Further large-scale studies are needed to validate our findings.

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Subject

Physiology (medical),Physiology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3