Author:
Biller-Andorno Nikola,Biller Armin
Abstract
Advance directives allow people to declare their treatment preferences for a potential future state of incompetency. Covid-19, with its high numbers of quickly deteriorating patients requiring intensive care, has acutely demonstrated how helpful it would be for clinicians to have reliable, readily available, up-to-date information at hand to be able to act in accordance with what the individual patient would have wanted. Yet for the past few decades advance directives have fallen short of their potential, for various reasons. At worst, advance directives are perceived as unwieldy legal documents that put excessive demands on patients without providing useful guidance for better care. Recent efforts such as advance care planning have tried to remedy some of these shortcomings but have so far met with limited success. We suggest a new concept—the Advance Care Compass—that harnesses the potential of digitalization in healthcare to overcome many of difficulties encountered so far.
Reference27 articles.
1. After the Cruzan case: the primary care physician and the use of advance directives;Doukas;J Am Board Fam Pract.,1992
2. Terri S. A tragedy compounded;Quill;N Engl J Med.,2005
3. Sources of concern about the patient self-determination act;Wolf;N Engl J Med.,1991
4. Special issue: advance directives from a cross-cultural perspective;Biller-Andorno;Bioethics.,2010
5. Patient self-determination act: providers offer information on advance directives but effectiveness uncertain1995
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献