Do public television channels provide more diversity than private ones?

Author:

Farchy Joëlle

Abstract

Since early 2009 there has been no advertising on French public television channels after 8 p.m. One of the arguments in favour of this reform was that it would promote diversity and that public channels would be less tempted to broadcast homogeneous programming to generate greater advertising revenue. Based on a comparison between British, French and Turkish channels the aim of this paper is to determine whether public channels perform better in terms of diversity than private ones. The paper recalls the reasons why public television channels should differentiate themselves from their private counterparts as far as diversity is concerned. A methodology for assessing diversity, which includes a set of indexes for measuring diversity of programming as well as tools for assessing disparity, is then proposed. Earlier literature finds that public television channels are more diverse than and significantly distinct from their private counterparts. In this exploratory study we will show that, contrary to the literature, public channels have no clear advantage in terms of diversity. Competitive pressure aimed at maximizing viewership plays a role for all channels regardless of their mode of funding, thus leading to greater homogeneity of programming.

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Reference30 articles.

1. ASLAMA, Minna (2006), “The Diversity Challenge: Changing Television Markets and Public Service Programming in Finland, 1993-2004”, Working Paper, April.

2. BAXTER, William F. (1974), “Regulation and Diversity in Communications Media”, The American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings of the Eighty-sixth Annual meeting of the American Economic Association, 64, 2, May, p.392-399.

3. BBC (2009), BBC Annual Report and Accounts 2008/09.

4. How should cultural diversity be measured? An application using the French publishing industry;BENHAMOU;Journal of Cultural Economics,2007

5. BENHAMOU, Françoise, PELTIER, Stéphanie (2009), “The Stirling model on assessing diversity using UIS cinema data”, Final Report, Unesco Institute for Statistics, September.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3