Author:
Cranney Jacquelyn,Morris Sue,Norris Kimberley,Connolly Caitlin E.
Abstract
The aim of this systematic review is to provide, for the first time, a broad overview of the scope and nature of the current English language concept of ‘psychological literacy' (PL) as evidenced in the literature, primarily since 2010. Covidence systematic review methodology yielded 112 papers that were scored on 23 specific criteria/questions relevant to addressing predetermined research questions. PL has been conceptualized as both a general capability (e.g., ethical application of psychological knowledge) and a group of capabilities (discipline-specific knowledge and research methods, and more generic capabilities such as communication). Variability in the constellation of group capabilities has led to challenges in operationalization and thus measurement, signaling the need for international consensus and improved measurement. We propose a model for how PL is related to psychologically literate citizenship and global citizenship. Key papers explore PL as an integrative concept in psychology. All papers were relevant to psychology education, with most prevalent being undergraduate level, and least prevalent being graduate level. There were numerous papers providing practical PL teaching and assessment strategies. PL as a pedagogical approach has been a necessary and richly diverse focus. Finally, a revisioning of PL within the context of psychology education, as well as recommendations for further research and development, are suggested.
Reference132 articles.
1. AmselE.
AllenL.
BauerR.
Psychological Literacy: Its Nature, Acquisition, and Application. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference of Psychology Educators, August, Flagstaff AZ2014
2. American Psychological AssociationPrinciples for Quality Undergraduate Education in Psychology2011
3. American Psychological Association The APA Guidelines for the Undergraduate Psychology Major: Version 2.02013
4. American Psychological Association The APA Introductory Psychology Initiative2021
5. Integrated conative model of well-being: from motives to well-being;Bahrami;J. Happiness Stud. Interdiscipl. Forum Subj. Well-Being,2018
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献