Author:
Humphry Stephen,Adie Lenore,Maxwell Carolyn,Sappl Sonia
Abstract
Standard setting of extended performances is fraught with difficulties due to the subjective nature of the scoring decision. This article introduces and reports results of a novel systematic method for setting standards for assessments that require extended performances: the Scaled Exemplar Standard Setting method (SESS). This two-stage method brings together (1) pairwise comparison of samples to scale performances and (2) standard setting involving multiple standards with tasks presented to judges in a validated order. By utilizing paired comparison methodology in the first stage, the judgment is made more manageable by chunking it into a series of pairs. This method produces scaled performances that can be checked for internal consistency of the judgments. The validated, ordered performances are used in the standard setting stage, making the task for judges as transparent and straightforward as possible. Recommendations and implications for standard setting are discussed in light of the results.
Funder
Australian Research Council
Reference46 articles.
1. Relationships between the Thurstone and Rasch approaches to item scaling;Andrich;Appl. Psychol. Meas.,1978
2. An index of person separation in latent trait theory, the traditional KR.20 index, and the Guttman scale response pattern;Andrich;Educ. Res. Perspect.,1982
3. Scales, norms, and equivalent scores;Angoff,1971
4. The reliability of setting grade boundaries using comparative judgement;Benton;Res. Pap. Educ.,2016
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献