Author:
Chaló Paulo,Huet Isabel,Nikoletou Dimitra,Pereira Anabela
Abstract
IntroductionSustainable development is increasingly recognized as a crucial component of education at all levels, including specialized academic work. As a result, the importance of Ph.D. training in producing highly skilled academics and professionals who can contribute to sustainable development has been acknowledged, leading to increased investments in doctoral training across Europe. However, the diversity in Ph.D. training across countries and universities suggests a lack of studies based on best practices for developing effective doctoral training programs.MethodsThis study aimed to contribute to this discussion by combining the perspectives of 31 Ph.D. supervisors and directors from Portugal and England regarding the best practices for Ph.D. training. Participants from different disciplines were interviewed using semi-structured face-to-face interviews, and the data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.ResultsThe study found that, despite coming from different countries, the participants' perceptions regarding the challenges and strategies for improving doctoral education were similar. Based on these findings, the study proposes a three-stage program for structuring doctoral training, consisting of initial intensive training, assessment of individual needs, and tailored training.DiscussionThe proposed program has the potential to be valuable in the development or restructuring of Ph.D. programs to address the primary needs of Ph.D. students, optimize institutional resources, and promote on-time completion by facilitating the timely development of necessary competencies for Ph.D. research. Furthermore, this approach could enhance the quality of Ph.D. education, broaden the spectrum and quality of graduates' competencies, and contribute to achieving sustainable development goals.
Funder
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Reference41 articles.
1. Supervisory patterns and practices: Case studies at the University of Manchester, United Kingdom;Abiddin;SSRN Elect. J.,2005
2. Content and context in knowledge production: a critical review of doctoral supervision literature;Bastalich;Stud. High. Educ.,2017
3. The continuing evolution of the research doctorate,;Bernstein;Globalization and its Impacts on the Quality of PhD Education: Forces and Forms in Doctoral Education Worldwide,2014
4. 100 Years of the PhD in the UK,
BogleD.
Vitae Researcher Development International Conference 2018.2018
5. Using thematic analysis in psychology;Braun;Qual. Res. Psychol.,2006