Predicting formative feedback practices: improving learning and minimising a tendency to ignore feedback

Author:

Brown Gavin T. L.,Andersson Catarina,Winberg Mikael,Palm Torulf

Abstract

IntroductionTeacher conceptions of feedback ideally predict their feedback practices, but little robust evidence identifies which beliefs matter to practices. It is logical to presume that teacher conceptions of feedback would align with the policy framework of an educational jurisdiction. The Teacher Conceptions of Feedback (TCoF) inventory was developed in New Zealand which has a relatively low-stakes, formative policy framework.MethodsThis study surveyed 451 Swedish teachers working in Years 1-9, a policy context that prioritises teachers using multiple data sources to help students learn. The study used a translated version of the TCoF inventory, but isolated six items related to formative feedback practices from various factors.ResultsA six-factor TCoF was recovered (Praise, Improvement, Ignore, Required, PASA, and Timely), giving partial replication to the previous study. A well-fitting structural equation model showed formative practices were predicted by just two conceptions of feedback (i.e., feedback improves learning and students may ignore feedback).DiscussionThis study demonstrates that the TCoF inventory can be used to identify plausible relations from feedback beliefs to formative feedback practices.

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Subject

Education

Reference51 articles.

1. The theory of planned behavior;Ajzen;Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process.,1991

2. Structural equation modeling in practice – a review and recommended 2-step approach;Anderson;Psychol. Bull.,1988

3. Secondary school teachers’ knowledge and practices about constructive feedback: evidence from Karachi;Aslam;Pakistan. Cakrawala Pendidikan,2021

4. Factor analysis: exploratory and confirmatory;Bandalos,2010

5. Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: checking assumptions concerning regression residuals;Barker;Am. J. Clin. Nutr.,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3