Online or face-to-face problem-based learning tutorials? Comparing perceptions and preferences of students and tutors

Author:

Atwa Hani Salem,Nasr El-Din Wael Amin,Kumar Archana Prabu,Potu Bhagath Kumar,Tayem Yasin Ibrahim,Al-Ansari Ahmed Mohamed,Deifalla Abdelhalim Salem,Shehata Mohamed Hany

Abstract

IntroductionProblem-based learning (PBL) tutorials are recognized as an effective strategy for building clinical and research skills in modern-day medical education. Despite the wide adoption of this instructional strategy, worldwide research findings reported noticeable differences in the perceptions towards online versus face-to-face modes of PBL conduction among students and their tutors.MethodsThis cross-sectional analytical study was conducted at the College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University (CMMS-AGU), Kingdom of Bahrain, during the academic year 2022-2023. The study examined the differences in perceptions and preferences among students and tutors regarding online and face-to-face modes of PBL tutorials. The study also compared the performance of 3rd and 4th year medical students who were exposed to PBL tutorials through both modes.ResultsThe performance of students in tutorials in both modes revealed no statistically significant difference. The study found that tutors reported more positive perception toward the face-to-face mode compared to the online mode of conducting PBL tutorials than students, while students reported more positive perception toward the online mode compared to the face-to-face mode of conducting PBL tutorials than tutors. Several advantages and challenges of both modes were recounted by the students and tutors.ConclusionOur study concludes that students were in favor of the online mode of conducting PBL sessions, while tutors were in favor of the face-to-face mode. Comparable performance of students in PBL tutorials implies that the online mode of conducting PBL tutorials might be as effective as the face-to-face mode for meeting teaching objectives and students’ learning outcomes. The difference between perceptions of students and faculty can be attributed to multiple factors including generation difference, previous experiences, and digital literacy. It is recommended that faculty receive proper training for effectively adopting online modes of learning.

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Reference44 articles.

1. Model for utilizing distance learning post COVID-19 using (PACT)™ a cross sectional qualitative study;Ahmed;BMC Med. Educ.,2020

2. Foundations of educational theory for online learning;Ally,2008

3. Impact of COVID19-pandemic on students' performance in a problem-based learning system: comparative study between face-to-face and virtual learning;Al-Shaibani;Arab Gulf J. Sci. Res.,2020

4. EFL writing teaching/learning could go online: instructors’ perceptions, students’ perceptions, and achievement;AlTamimi;J. Lang. Teach. Res.,2023

5. Problem-based learning in online environments;An;Quart. Rev. Distance Educ.,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3