Author:
Preston Jane P.,Claypool Tim R.
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to review common assessment practices for Indigenous students. We start by presenting positionalities—our personal and professional background identities. Then we explain common terms associated with Indigeneity and Indigenous and Western worldviews. We describe the meaning of document analysis, the chosen qualitative research design, and we explicate the delimitations and limitations of the paper. The review of the literature revealed four main themes. First, assessment is subjugated by a Western worldview. Next, many linguistic assessment practices disadvantage Indigenous students, and language-specific and culture-laden standardized tests are often discriminatory. Last, there is a pervasive focus on cognitive assessment. We discuss how to improve assessment for Indigenous students. For example, school divisions and educators need quality professional development and knowledge about hands-on assessment, multiple intelligences, and Western versus Indigenous assessment inconsistencies. Within the past 20 years, assessment tactics for Indigenous students has remained, more or less, the same. We end with a short discussion addressing this point.
Reference84 articles.
1. Is Canada Really an Education Superpower? the Impact of Non-participation on Results from PISA 2015;Anders;Educ. Assess. Eval. Account.,2021
2. The Cultural Practice of Participatory Transpersonal Visions: An Indigenous Perspective;Bastien;ReVision,2003
3. Sharing Complex Visions for Inclusive Schools;Betts;Can. J. Native Stud.,2005
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献