Blaming it on NATO? Framing the role of NATO in the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine on Twitter

Author:

Kobilke Lara,Kulichkina Aytalina,Baghumyan Ani,Pipal Christian

Abstract

IntroductionSince social media has become a significant tool for conflict communication amid the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine, researchers have grown more interested in the digital content citizens are exposed to.MethodsTo further investigate the role of social media in the ongoing invasion, we conducted a manual content analysis to examine tweets in English, Russian, and German that explicitly mentioned NATO in the context of the full-scale invasion during February to May 2022. Our analysis explored how these language-specific Twitter communities framed NATO's role in the conflict.ResultsWe found that English-speaking tweeters were more likely to hold NATO responsible for finding a solution and least likely to blame NATO for the war compared to German and Russian speakers. We also observed that the Russian-speaking Twitter community exhibits a comparatively lower tendency to hold NATO accountable for the ongoing war as compared to their German-speaking counterparts, and they are also notably the least likely to expect NATO to bring an end to the war. Finally, English-speaking Twitter users who attribute blame to NATO for the ongoing war tend to adhere to a preconceived notion, rather than arriving at an interpretation based on the situation at hand. This is in contrast to the Russian-speaking community, where the opposite is true. German-speaking users fall somewhere in between these two perspectives.DiscussionOur research contributes to the literature by providing a novel integration of conceptual and methodological perspectives on the framing and stance-taking of social media users during wartime, addressing known research gaps in the comparative analysis of these discussions, i.e., adding “non-English” perspectives. It also highlights the importance of cultural and linguistic sensitivity when addressing responsibility in armed conflicts and the need to consider the diverse perspectives derived from divergent problem definitions and evaluative standards.

Funder

Universität Wien

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Public Administration,Safety Research,Sociology and Political Science

Reference66 articles.

1. Framing war and conflict: introduction to the special issue;Al Nahed;Media War Conflict,2018

2. ‘Smells of Genocide': How Putin Justifies Russia's War in Ukraine2022

3. BadenC. Constructions of Violent Conflict in Public Discourse. Conceptual Framework for the Content & 2014

4. Com(ple)menting the news on the financial crisis: the contribution of news users' commentary to the diversity of viewpoints in the public debate;Baden;Eur. J. Commun,2014

5. Conceptualizing viewpoint diversity in news discourse;Baden;Journalism,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3