Virtual focus groups among individuals with use disorders: assessing feasibility and acceptability in an underserved clinical population

Author:

Bergeria Cecilia L.,Park Brandon,Satyavolu Prem Umang,Dunn Kelly E.,Dworkin Robert H.,Strain Eric C.

Abstract

ObjectiveThere are substantial barriers to conducting research among individuals with stigmatized and complicated health conditions like substance use disorders. These barriers slow progress when developing, refining, and assessing interventions to better treat underserved populations. Virtual focus groups are an innovative method for collecting data from individuals via a discreet and accessible platform which can inform novel as well as existing treatment approaches. This article reports on the feasibility and acceptability of virtual focus groups as a mechanism to recruit and engage geographically and demographically diverse samples of participants with substance use disorders that are otherwise logistically difficult to assess.MethodParticipants were assessed for eligibility for a virtual focus group study based on demographic features, drug use history, and psychiatric history via a remote, interview-based screening. Focus groups were completed anonymously without video or name-sharing. Discussion contributions, quantified with number of times speaking and total number of words spoken, were compared across gender, and treatment status. Participants provided quantitative and qualitative feedback on the focus group experience in a follow-up survey.ResultsFocus groups (N=26) based in geographical areas throughout the United States were conducted with 88 individuals with opioid use disorder or stimulant use disorder. Discussion contributions were comparable between genders and among individuals in treatment versus those seeking treatment. A follow-up survey (n=50, 57% of focus group participants) reflected high levels of enjoyment, comfort, and honesty during focus group discussions.DiscussionFindings suggest virtual focus groups can be an effective and efficient tool for substance use research.

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Reference29 articles.

1. Opioid use disorder: pernicious and persistent;Bergeria;Am J Psychiatry,2022

2. What is the impact of mental health-related stigma on help-seeking? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies;Clement;Psychol Med,2015

3. Barriers and facilitators to recruitment and enrollment of HIV-infected individuals with opioid use disorder in a clinical trial;Hoffman;BMC Health Serv Res,2019

4. Diversity inclusion in United States opioid pharmacological treatment trials: A systematic review;Nalven;Exp Clin Psychopharmacol,2021

5. The representation of females in clinical trials for substance use disorder conducted in the United States, (2010–19);Gunn,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3