Author:
McVey Alana J.,Glaves Katherine Jo,Seaver Samantha,Casagrande Karís A.
Abstract
Autistic adolescents and adults commonly experience mental health concerns; however, mental health clinicians may hold implicit stigmatizing views of autism that contribute to case conceptualization and treatment goal setting that align more with caregivers’ than clients’ goals. This impingement on client autonomy is concerning, problematic, and potentially harmful for autistic clients who are of an age to set their own treatment agenda regardless of co-occurring intellectual disability and/or language delays. An application of the shared decision-making framework, an evidence-based tool for promoting client autonomy, can help to avoid these challenges in treatment. In this perspective, we use a case vignette as an anchor for discussing the imperative of honoring autistic clients’ autonomy in mental health treatment and guiding shared decision-making to reduce stigma, promote autonomy, and increase collaborative care for autistic clients in mental health treatment.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference27 articles.
1. 2014 ACA code of ethics2014
2. The principles of medical ethics with annotations especially applicable to psychiatry2013
3. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, amended effective June 1, 2010, and January 1, 2017)2017
4. Code of ethics of the National Association of Social Workers2021
5. Autistic adolescents’ and their parents’ visions for the future: how aligned are they?;Kirby;Autism Adulthood,2022