Stress-related reduction of hippocampal subfield volumes in major depressive disorder: A 7-Tesla study

Author:

Alper Judy,Feng Rui,Verma Gaurav,Rutter Sarah,Huang Kuang-han,Xie Long,Yushkevich Paul,Jacob Yael,Brown Stephanie,Kautz Marin,Schneider Molly,Lin Hung-Mo,Fleysher Lazar,Delman Bradley N.,Hof Patrick R.,Murrough James W.,Balchandani Priti

Abstract

BackgroundMajor depressive disorder (MDD) is a prevalent health problem with complex pathophysiology that is not clearly understood. Prior work has implicated the hippocampus in MDD, but how hippocampal subfields influence or are affected by MDD requires further characterization with high-resolution data. This will help ascertain the accuracy and reproducibility of previous subfield findings in depression as well as correlate subfield volumes with MDD symptom scores. The objective of this study was to assess volumetric differences in hippocampal subfields between MDD patients globally and healthy controls (HC) as well as between a subset of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) patients and HC using automatic segmentation of hippocampal subfields (ASHS) software and ultra-high field MRI.MethodsThirty-five MDD patients and 28 HC underwent imaging using 7-Tesla MRI. ASHS software was applied to the imaging data to perform automated hippocampal segmentation and provide volumetrics for analysis. An exploratory analysis was also performed on associations between symptom scores for diagnostic testing and hippocampal subfield volumes.ResultsCompared to HC, MDD and TRD patients showed reduced right-hemisphere CA2/3 subfield volume (p = 0.01, η2 = 0.31 and p = 0.3, η2 = 0.44, respectively). Additionally, negative associations were found between subfield volumes and life-stressor checklist scores, including left CA1 (p = 0.041, f2 = 0.419), left CA4/DG (p = 0.010, f2 = 0.584), right subiculum total (p = 0.038, f2 = 0.354), left hippocampus total (p = 0.015, f2 = 0.134), and right hippocampus total (p = 0.034, f2 = 0.110). Caution should be exercised in interpreting these results due to the small sample size and low power.ConclusionDetermining biomarkers for MDD and TRD pathophysiology through segmentation on high-resolution MRI data and understanding the effects of stress on these regions can enable better assessment of biological response to treatment selection and may elucidate the underlying mechanisms of depression.

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3