Author:
Londoño Tobón Amalia,McNicholas Eileen,Clare Camille A.,Ireland Luu D.,Payne Jennifer L.,Moore Simas Tiffany A.,Scott Rachel K.,Becker Madeleine,Byatt Nancy
Abstract
The Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson in June 2022 reversed precedent which had previously protected abortion prior to fetal viability as a universal right within the United States. This decision almost immediately led to abortion restrictions across 25 states. The resulting lack of access to abortion care for millions of pregnant people will have profound physical and mental health consequences, the full effects of which will not be realized for years to come. Approximately 1 in 5 women access abortions in the U.S. each year. These women are diverse and represent all American groups. The Supreme court decision, however, will affect populations that have and continue to be marginalized the most. Forcing pregnant individuals to carry unwanted pregnancies worsens health outcomes and mortality risk for both the perinatal individual and the offspring. The US has one of the highest maternal mortality rates and this rate is projected to increase with abortion bans. Abortion policies also interfere with appropriate medical care of pregnant people leading to less safe pregnancies for all. Beyond the physical morbidity, the psychological sequelae of carrying a forced pregnancy to term will lead to an even greater burden of maternal mental illness, exacerbating the already existing maternal mental health crisis. This perspective piece reviews the current evidence of abortion denial on women’s mental health and care. Based on the current evidence, we discuss the clinical, educational, societal, research, and policy implications of the Dobbs v. Jackson Supreme Court decision.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference65 articles.
1. Abortion Incidence and Service Availability in the United States, 2017
2. Morbidity and mortality weekly report Centers for Disease Control and Prevention MMWR editorial and production staff (serials) MMWR editorial board;Walensky,2019
3. Dobbs rPuling is an assault on reproductive health, safe medical practice;Resneck,2022
4. American Psychiatric Association statement on Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s health Organization,2022
5. ACOG statement on the decision in Dobbs V. Jackson;Hoskins,2022
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献