Author:
Hofstad Tore,Rugkåsa Jorun,Ose Solveig Osborg,Nyttingnes Olav,Kjus Solveig Helene Høymork,Husum Tonje Lossius
Abstract
Background: Compulsory hospitalisation in mental healthcare is contested. For ethical and legal reasons, it should only be used as a last resort. Geographical variation could indicate that some areas employ compulsory hospitalisation more frequently than is strictly necessary. Explaining variation in compulsory hospitalisation might contribute to reducing overuse, but research on associations with service characteristics remains patchy.Objectives: We aimed to investigate the associations between the levels of compulsory hospitalisation and the characteristics of primary mental health services in Norway between 2015 and 2018 and the amount of variance explained by groups of explanatory variables.Methods: We applied random-effects within–between Poisson regression of 461 municipalities/city districts, nested within 72 community mental health centre catchment areas (N = 1,828 municipality-years).Results: More general practitioners, mental health nurses, and the total labour-years in municipal mental health and addiction services per population are associated with lower levels of compulsory hospitalisations within the same areas, as measured by both persons (inpatients) and events (hospitalisations). Areas that, on average, have more general practitioners and public housing per population have lower levels of compulsory hospitalisation, while higher levels of compulsory hospitalisation are seen in areas with a longer history of supported employment and the systematic gathering of service users' experiences. In combination, all the variables, including the control variables, could account for 39–40% of the variation, with 5–6% related to municipal health services.Conclusion: Strengthening primary mental healthcare by increasing the number of general practitioners and mental health workers can reduce the use of compulsory hospitalisation and improve the quality of health services.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference48 articles.
1. Kunnskapsstaus med Hensyn til Skadevirkninger av Tvang I det Psykiske Helsevernet. Utredning for paulsrudutvalget. [Knowledge Status With Regard to Adverse Effects of Coercion in the Mental Health Field. Study for the Paulsrud Committee]36779
NorvollR
NOU.92011
2. Outcomes of Involuntary Hospital Admission–a Review;Katsakou;Acta Psychiatr Scand.,2006
3. 2019
4. Reversing hard won victories in the name of human rights: a critique of the general comment on article 12 of the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities;Freeman;Lancet Psychiatry.,2015
5. Criteria, procedures, and future prospects of involuntary treatment in psychiatry around the world: a narrative review;Saya;Front Psychiatry.,2019
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献