Author:
Peter Brad G.,Messina Joseph P.,Breeze Victoria,Fung Cadi Y.,Kapoor Abhinav,Fan Peilei
Abstract
Measuring agricultural productivity is a multiscale spatiotemporal problem that requires multiscale solutions. In Vietnam, rice comprises a substantial portion of the cultivated area and is a major export crop that supplies much of the global food system. Understanding the when and where of rice productivity is vital to addressing changes to yields and food security, yet descriptive summarizations will vary depending on the spatial or temporal scale of analysis. This paper explores rice trends across Vietnam over a 19-year period, giving specific attention to modifiable spatiotemporal unit problems by evaluating productivity across multiple time periods and administrative levels. A generalizable procedure and tools are offered for visualizing multiscale time-series remote sensing data in matrix and map form, not only to elucidate the effects of modifiable spatiotemporal unit problems, but also to demonstrate how these problems serve as a useful research framework. Remote sensing indices (e.g., LAI and EVI) were evaluated against national and provincial estimates across Vietnam during multiple crop production periods using the Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC) to establish a relationship. To overcome challenges posed by long-term observations masking emerging phenomena, time-series matrices and multi-spatial and multi-temporal maps were produced to show when, where, and how rice productivity across Vietnam is changing. Results showed that LAI and EVI are favorable indices for measuring rice agriculture in Vietnam. At the province scale, LAI compared to nationally reported production estimates reached a Pearson’s r of 0.960; 0.974 for EVI during the spring crop production period. For questions such as, “What portion of Vietnam exhibits a negative linear trend in rice production?”, the answer depends on how space and time are organized. At the province scale, 25.4% of Vietnam can be observed as exhibiting a negative linear trend; however, when viewed at the district scale, this metric rises to 45.7%. This research contributes to the discussion surrounding ontological problems of how agricultural productivity is measured and conveyed. To better confront how agriculture is assessed, adopting a multiscale framework can provide a more holistic view than the conventional single spatial or temporal selection.
Funder
National Aeronautics and Space Administration