Author:
Wei Li,Li Li,Xu Zigang,Zhang Bin,Han Xiaofeng,Wang Chen,Liu Yuanxiang,Xiu Bingyu,Qiu Lei,Sun Yujuan,Ma Lin
Abstract
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical efficacy and safety of two different doses of propranolol in the treatment of cutaneous kaposiform hemangioendothelioma (KHE).MethodsThe cohort of this prospective case–control study comprised 11 children with KHE treated from October 2015 to August 2018 in our institution. All participants were clinically and pathologically diagnosed as having cutaneous KHE. The children were allocated to two groups: six children in Group A (low-dose group) received oral propranolol 1.5 mg/kg/d, whereas five in Group B (high-dose group) received oral propranolol 2 mg/kg/d. The children were checked and photographed before and after treatment. Changes in the tumors were tracked by clinical and ultrasound examination. Follow-up visits to monitor for adverse reactions occurred regularly.ResultsGrade I, Grade II, and Grade IV improvements in tumors were each noted in one child in Group A (three improved in total) and Grade III in two and Grade IV in another two children in Group B (four improved in total). Oral propranolol was effective in 50 and 80% of children in Groups A and B, respectively; this difference is statistically significant (P < 0.01). Minor adverse reactions occurred in eight of the 11 children.ConclusionsPropranolol treatment is effective against cutaneous KHE. There were no serious adverse reactions, and the treatment was safe in the long term. A dose of 2 mg/kg/d was more effective than 1.5 mg/kg/d in the treatment of KHE and did not increase the rate of adverse reactions. Children with KHE should be treated with propranolol 2 mg/kg/d orally.
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献