World Health Organization (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set Development for Interstitial Lung Disease

Author:

Saketkoo Lesley Ann,Escorpizo Reuben,Varga Janos,Keen Kevin John,Fligelstone Kim,Birring Surinder S.,Alexanderson Helene,Pettersson Henrik,Chaudhry Humza Ahmad,Poole Janet L.,Regardt Malin,LeSage Daphne,Sarver Catherine,Lanario Joseph,Renzoni Elisabetta,Scholand Mary Beth,Lammi Matthew R.,Kowal-Bielecka Otylia,Distler Oliver,Frech Tracy,Shapiro Lee,Varju Cecilia,Volkmann Elizabeth R.,Bernstein Elana J.,Drent Marjolein,Obi Ogugua Ndili,Patterson Karen C.,Russell Anne-Marie,

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) introduced the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) as a scientific method of disability data collection comprised of >1,200 categories describing the spectrum of impairment types (functional, symptoms-based and anatomical) under the bio-psycho-social model with consideration of environmental and personal factors (pf). ICF Core Sets and ICF Checklists are streamlined disease-specific resources for clinical use, service provision, and for use in health economics and health policy. ICF can disclose strengths and weaknesses across multiple patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and help consolidate best-fitting question-items from multiple PROMs. Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), are generally progressive, with restrictive physiology sometimes occurring in the context of multi-organ autoimmunity/inflammatory conditions such as connective tissue diseases (CTDs). In spite of significant associated morbidity and potential disability, ILD has yet to be linked to the ICF.Methods: Each instrument and their question-items within the consensus-recommended core sets for clinical trials in ILD were deconstructed to single concept units, and then linked per updated ICF linkage rules. Inter-linker agreement was established. Three additional subsequently validated measures were also included.Results: One-hundred-eleven ICF categories were identified for ten PROMs and three traditional objective measures that were amenable to ICF linkage. The proportion of agreement ranged from 0.79 (95% CI: 0.62, 0.91) to 0.93 (0.76, 0.99) with the overall proportion of inter-linker agreement being very high 0.86 (0.82, 0.89) for the initial instruments, with 94–100% for the three additional PROMs. Thirty-four new ‘Personal Factors’ emerged to capture disease-specific qualities not elsewhere described in ICF, e.g. ‘pf_embarrassed by cough’ or ‘pf_panic/afraid when can’t get a breath’.Conclusion: This first known effort in ICF linkage of ILD has provided important revelations on the current utility of the ICF in lung disease. Results have indicated areas for meaningful assessment of ICF descriptors for lung impairment. The mapping across PROMs provides insight into possibilities of developing more streamline and precise instrumentation. Finally, familiarity with the ICF in ILD may enable clinicians to experience a smoother transition with the imminent harmonization of ICD and ICF, ICD-11.

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology

Reference48 articles.

1. Disabilities of importance for patients to improve--using a patient preference tool in rheumatoid arthritis;Alemo Munters;Disabil. Rehabil.,2014

2. Patient preference assessment reveals disease aspects not covered by recommended outcomes in polymyositis and dermatomyositis;Alemo Munters;ISRN Rheumatol.,2011

3. Development of the myositis activities profile--validity and reliability of a self-administered questionnaire to assess activity limitations in patients with polymyositis/dermatomyositis;Alexanderson;J. Rheumatol.,2002

4. Identifying core domains to assess flare in rheumatoid arthritis: An OMERACT international patient and provider combined delphi consensus;Bartlett;Ann. Rheum. Dis.,2012

5. ICF linking rules: An update based on lessons learned.;Cieza;J. Rehabil. Med.,2005

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3