Deep learning-based quantification of brain atrophy using 2D T1-weighted MRI for Alzheimer’s disease classification

Abstract

BackgroundDetermining brain atrophy is crucial for the diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases. Despite detailed brain atrophy assessments using three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, their practical utility is limited by cost and time. This study introduces deep learning algorithms for quantifying brain atrophy using a more accessible two-dimensional (2D) T1, aiming to achieve cost-effective differentiation of dementia of the Alzheimer’s type (DAT) from cognitively unimpaired (CU), while maintaining or exceeding the performance obtained with T1-3D individuals and to accurately predict AD-specific atrophy similarity and atrophic changes [W-scores and Brain Age Index (BAI)].MethodsInvolving 924 participants (478 CU and 446 DAT), our deep learning models were trained on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volumes from 2D T1 images and compared with 3D T1 images. The performance of the models in differentiating DAT from CU was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Pearson’s correlation analyses were used to evaluate the relations between 3D T1 and 2D T1 measurements of cortical thickness and CSF volumes, AD-specific atrophy similarity, W-scores, and BAIs.ResultsOur deep learning models demonstrated strong correlations between 2D and 3D T1-derived CSF volumes, with correlation coefficients r ranging from 0.805 to 0.971. The algorithms based on 2D T1 accurately distinguished DAT from CU with high accuracy (area under the curve values of 0.873), which were comparable to those of algorithms based on 3D T1. Algorithms based on 2D T1 image-derived CSF volumes showed high correlations in AD-specific atrophy similarity (r = 0.915), W-scores for brain atrophy (0.732 ≤ r ≤ 0.976), and BAIs (r = 0.821) compared with those based on 3D T1 images.ConclusionDeep learning-based analysis of 2D T1 images is a feasible and accurate alternative for assessing brain atrophy, offering diagnostic precision comparable to that of 3D T1 imaging. This approach offers the advantage of the availability of T1-2D imaging, as well as reduced time and cost, while maintaining diagnostic precision comparable to T1-3D.