Abstract
The primary goal of diagnostic nuclear medicine is to provide complete and accurate reports without equivocation or disclaimers. If specific clinical questions cannot be answered because of radiopharmaceutical extravasation, the imaging study may have to be repeated. The decision to reimage is based on several factors including the diagnostic quality of the images, additional patient radiation dose, patient burden, and administrative constraints. Through process improvement efforts, nuclear medicine departments can significantly reduce the frequency of extravasation and thereby also the need for reimaging. Communication with the patient is important any time extravasation may impact their immediate or future care. The circumstances and potential ramifications should be explained, and patient concerns should be addressed. Although recent arguments have been made in favor of investigating and addressing only those extravasations which result in serious patient injury, patients and their referring physicians deserve to know any time their nuclear medicine study may have been impacted.
Reference42 articles.
1. Infiltration and extravasation;Hadaway;Am J Nurs,2007
2. FDG dose extravasations in PET/CT: frequency and impact on SUV measurements;Osman;Front Oncol,2011
3. Impact of FDG extravasation on SUV measurements in clinical PET/CT. Should we routinely scan the injection site?;Hall;J Nucl Med,2006
4. Contamination in 18F-FDG PET/CT: an initial experience;Bains;J Nucl Med,2009
5. FDG manual injection verses infusion system: a comparison of dose precision and extravasation;Krumrey;J Nucl Med,2009
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献