Author:
Bureau Côme,Rafat Cédric,Taupin Jean Luc,Malard Stéphanie,Mesnard Laurent,François Hélène,Petit-Hoang Camille,Ouali Nacera,Hertig Alexandre,Jamme Matthieu,Buob David,Rondeau Eric,Galichon Pierre,Luque Yosu
Abstract
Whether immunoadsorption (IADS) as part of desensitization protocols could facilitate deceased donor kidney transplantation (KT) in highly sensitized (HS) patients remains to be proven. We retrospectively analyzed our IADS based desensitization protocol for deceased donor KTs between 2013 and 2018. Fifteen HS patients (age 52 years [40–56]) were included. Waiting time before IADS was 6 years [5–10] and the interval between IADS initiation and KT was 5 months [1–12] for the 14 transplanted patients. Nine patients had prior KT. Calculated panel reactive antibody decreased significantly during the protocol (99.3% [92.5–99.9] vs. 79.4% [56.7–81.9]; p = 0.004). Death-censored graft survival was 85.7% at 1 and 2 years post-transplantation. One-year median plasma creatinine level was 135 µmol/L [111–202]. Six developed active antibody mediated rejection (ABMR) at 1 year, with a median delay of 13 days [11–26]. Eight patients developed severe infections, including two fatal outcomes. Finally, compared to 93% of patients who received desensitization receiving a KT, only 43% of a control with similar characteristics underwent transplantation. However, no difference was found in overall probability of being alive with a functioning graft at the end of follow-up. The results indicate that our IADS-based desensitization strategy was not effective due to a high rate of ABMR and severe infectious complications which pose a challenge to its universalization.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献