Author:
Krems Jaimie Arona,French Juliana,Filip-Crawford Gabrielle
Abstract
Attending to women's intrasexual competition generates a straightforward prediction: Insofar as women actors sometimes use distinct tactics of aggression (e. g., related to social exclusion), women targets might possess distinct interpretations of and reactions to those tactics. We test this using one such tactic common among women: disgust expressions directed at targets of desired social exclusion. Across four experiments with U.S. adults (N = 1,019), women (more than men) (1) interpret same-gender disgust (but not anger) facial expressions potentially directed toward them as cues of impending social exclusion, and (2) report being hurt in reaction to these expressions, whether imagined or recalled. Further, (3) women (but not men) who are more dispositionally concerned with social belonging (but not vulnerability to disease) report greater hurt. Women seem to possess distinct interpretations of and reactions to aggression tactics that they uniquely and recurrently face. Identifying these often lesser-studied challenges women face may reveal additional, overlooked features of women's strategic social cognition and behavior.
Reference71 articles.
1. “Intrasexual rivalry among women,”;Arnocky,2016
2. “Sexual competition among women: a review of the theory and supporting evidence,”;Arnocky,2017
3. A factor analytic examination of women's and men's friendship preferences;Ayers;Pers. Individ. Differ.,2023
4. “Social relationships of female chimpanzees: diversity between captive social groups,”;Baker,1994
5. Illusory conjunctions of angry facial expressions follow intergroup biases;Becker;Psychol. Sci.,2010
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献