For the good of the party, for the good of the nation: ingroup projection can motivate support for political violence

Author:

Waddell Maitland W.,Wright Stephen C.,Waldzus Sven,Stebner Grant A.

Abstract

Support for political violence in the United States appears to be growing. We outline a model that positions ingroup projection—seeing ingroup values as the shared values of a larger inclusive societal group—as a key psychological process through which identification with political ingroups (Democrats/Republicans) and with national superordinate categories (Americans) influence support for political violence. We tested this model in two studies. Study 1 (N = 297) included original survey data collected during the 2016 US Presidential election, and analyses revealed that identification with Democrats or Republicans and identification with Americans both had positive indirect effects on support for political violence that were mediated by ingroup projection. Study 2 (N = 642) provided a preregistered replication of these results using original data collected during the 2022 US Midterm Senate elections. These results provide insight into the psychological processes that underlie support for political violence in the United States and elucidate a generalizable model for understanding destructive intergroup behaviors in a variety of real-world intergroup contexts.

Funder

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada

Mitacs

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Reference89 articles.

1. Christian Nationalism and political violence: victimhood, racial identity, conspiracy, and support for the Capitol Attacks;Armaly;Polit. Behav.,2022

2. “A dynamic model of engagement in normative and non-normative collective action: psychological antecedents, consequences, and barriers,”;Becker;European Review of Social Psychology: Volume 26,2016

3. Deciding to support violence: an empirical examination of systematic decision-making, activism, and support for political violence;Becker;Criminol. Crim. Just.,2021

4. BergengruenV. The United States of political violence. Time2022

5. BermanM. LoweryW. ‘It's now or never': How anti-Trump protests spread across the U.S. The Washington Post2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3