A surprising lack of consequences when constraining language

Author:

Vaughan-Johnston Thomas Ian,Nguyen Andrew,Jacobson Jill A.

Abstract

IntroductionLabels considered normatively appropriate for specific social identity groups change. Researchers have examined the effects of censorship and slur usage, but minimal research examines the psychological consequences of imposing new language constraints on people.MethodsAcross four samples of university students (Ntotal = 997), we sought participants' compliance in avoiding usage of numerous commonplace group labels while they wrote essays about obese people (Sample 1) or specific ethnic groups (Samples 2-4).ResultsWe observed consistently high compliance rates: participants either invented novel terminology to describe the group or avoided group labels entirely. We observed a substantial absence of task discomfort, attitudinal shifts regarding the group, or motivational shifts, according to Bayesian analyses. Nor did we detect negative effects of language constraint among people who saw themselves as opposed to censorship.DiscussionAlthough free speech and respectful language remain a multifaceted social debate, our findings show that university students are willing to follow even completely contrived language directives when describing social identity groups and to do so without substantial discomfort or backlash against those groups.

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Reference88 articles.

1. Whose words hurt? Contextual determinants of offensive speech;Almagro;Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull.,2021

2. Inclusive Language Guidelines2022

3. AndersonN. Linguists slam Cambridge University for Teaching 'Woke' German: Fury as Students are Taught 'Gender-Neutral' Version of the Language That Avoids Using Masculine Forms that are not 'Inclusive' to Non-Binary People2022

4. Censoring political opposition online: who does it and why;Ashokkumar;J. Exp. Soc. Psychol.,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3