Seroepidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 on a partially vaccinated island in Brazil: Determinants of infection and vaccine response
-
Published:2022-11-14
Issue:
Volume:10
Page:
-
ISSN:2296-2565
-
Container-title:Frontiers in Public Health
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Front. Public Health
Author:
Cerbino-Neto José,Peres Igor Tona,Varela Margareth Catoia,Brandão Luciana Gomes Pedro,Matos Juliana Arruda de,Pinto Luiz Felipe,Costa Marcellus Dias da,Garcia Márcio Henrique de Oliveira,Soranz Daniel,Maia Maria de Lourdes de Sousa,Krieger Marco Aurélio,Cunha Rivaldo Venâncio da,Camacho Luiz Antonio Bastos,Ranzani Otavio,Hamacher Silvio,Bozza Fernando Augusto,Penna Gerson Oliveira
Abstract
BackgroundA vaccination campaign targeted adults in response to the pandemic in the City of Rio de Janeiro.ObjectiveWe aimed to evaluate the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and identify factors associated with seropositivity on vaccinated and unvaccinated residents.MethodsWe performed a seroepidemiologic survey in all residents of Paquetá Island, a neighborhood of Rio de Janeiro city, during the COVID-19 vaccine roll-out. Serological tests were performed from June 16 to June 19, 2021, and adjusted seropositivity rates were estimated by age and epidemiological variables. Logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted ORs for risk factors to SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity in non-vaccinated individuals, and potential determinants of the magnitude of antibody responses in the seropositive population.ResultsWe included in the study 3,016 residents of Paquetá (83.5% of the island population). The crude seroprevalence of COVID-19 antibodies in our sample was 53.6% (95% CI = 51.0, 56.3). The risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity in non-vaccinated individuals were history of confirmed previous COVID-19 infection (OR = 4.74; 95% CI = 3.3, 7.0), being a household contact of a case (OR = 1.93; 95% CI = 1.5, 2.6) and in-person learning (OR = 2.01; 95% CI = 1.4, 3.0). Potential determinants of the magnitude of antibody responses among the seropositive were hybrid immunity, the type of vaccine received, and time since the last vaccine dose. Being vaccinated with Pfizer or AstraZeneca (Beta = 2.2; 95% CI = 1.8, 2.6) determined higher antibody titers than those observed with CoronaVac (Beta = 1.2; 95% CI = 0.9, 1.5).ConclusionsOur study highlights the impact of vaccination on COVID-19 collective immunity even in a highly affected population, showing the difference in antibody titers achieved with different vaccines and how they wane with time, reinforcing how these factors should be considered when estimating effectiveness of a vaccination program at any given time. We also found that hybrid immunity was superior to both infection-induced and vaccine-induced immunity alone, and online learning protected students from COVID-19 exposure.
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference25 articles.
1. IBGE Divulga Dados Preliminares do Teste do Censo na Ilha de Paquetá | Agência de Notí cias. Agência de Notícias - IBGE2021
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献